[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Eww
by Sertorius on Saturday 15/Sep/2001, @20:58
Well done IBM for sponsoring this and for donating money to open-source projects. Well done to the participants for having a go. However, if the aim was to create something either original or beautiful, then it has failed. Either there weren't many participants or the judges are colourblind (and are not aware of the existing range of KDE themes :-)

Are there any *original* themes out there? Something tasteful yet functional. I haven't seen too many KDE users using anything but the default theme (which looks bloody beautiful, thanks to Mosfet - a coder with artistic talent).

- Sertorius
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Desktop Environment
 ·   Also by Sertorius
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Eww
by reihal on Sunday 16/Sep/2001, @00:20
Yeah, you're right, Mosfet rules!
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: Eww
    by dfgsfg on Sunday 16/Sep/2001, @01:02
    Yeah, his liquid theme is soooooooooooooooo much better than all of those!
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: Eww
      by Carbon on Sunday 16/Sep/2001, @17:57
      Well... that's cause liquid has it's own widget style, which actually recodes parts of the UI drawing system, as opposed to just setting pixmaps and colors to things.
      [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: Eww
        by reihal on Monday 17/Sep/2001, @08:27
        I remember seeing a Widget Designer on Mosfet's site a long time ago.
        There was a screenshot, did anyone save this?
        Maybe Mosfet himself could tell us about it?
        Where are you, man?
        [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: Eww
      by Vadim Plessky on Tuesday 18/Sep/2001, @14:06
      > ...liquid theme is soooooooooooooooo much better than all of those!

      Well, it's your opinion, and I deserve it.
      And I think that Liquid sucks, in all its variants.
      At least in its current state - may be in one year it will become better :-)

      BR,

      Vadim Plessky
      [ Reply To This | View ]
"originality" [Re: Eww]
by Vadim Plessky on Tuesday 18/Sep/2001, @14:16
> ... if the aim was to create something either original or beautiful, then it > has failed. Either there weren't many participants or the judges are colourblind

Do you seriously expect that some good designers will work for $3000, even if money is going into his pocket (not a charity to Open Source project)?
Besides, I can tell you that good designers just *can't* design themes.
They are ok to paint background, but nothing else...
User Interface is rather specific thing.
There is a limitation on screen size, resolution is pretty low, and many icons have just 16x16 size (hopefully, KDE supports 21x21 as well :-)
It's quite difficult in such environment to create something tasteful and working at the same time.

As about originality:
May I ask you *where* you have seen something similar to my Egypt Office theme?
I doubt you have ever been in Egypt. Taking into consideration current political situation in the Middle East, I doubt you will visit Egypt in nearest future. Colors are original, window decorations - original. layout - original.
I hope you have also tried complimentary Widget theme - at least Egypt widgets (not Egypt Office, but..) are available on my web site, and on apps.kde.com


Best Regards,

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: "originality" [Re: Eww]
    by Sertorius on Tuesday 18/Sep/2001, @15:32
    Going by the screenshot on the contest web site, I see only 3 of the 5 buttons on the top are original, making it look inconsistent, plus the scrollbars etc. look like they've been pinched from the SGI theme, just with a different colour. Likewise, apart from the colour, the panel is exactly the same as the standard one. The background is just the default KDE gradent... so from this it appears that the theme is just 3 new buttons and some new colours.

    If OTOH you need some other bits to make this look decent then you should have included that in your theme package. If that was against the rules of the contest then it was a pointless contest... at least some open-source project got some funding I guess. I'll try your theme with the widget theme as well.

    As to whether good designers will work for free, look at the fine work of Mosfet... some people (probably true for you as well I'd guess) do it for the love of the work. That's the same reason I write Free software...

    - Sertorius
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: "originality" [Re: Eww]
      by Vadim Plessky on Wednesday 19/Sep/2001, @23:38
      > Going by the screenshot on the contest web site, I see only 3 of the 5 buttons on the top are original, making it look inconsistent, plus the scrollbars etc. look like they've been pinched from the SGI theme, just with a different colour. Likewise, apart from the colour, the panel is exactly the same as the standard one. The background is just the default KDE gradent... so from this it appears that the theme is just 3 new buttons and some new colours.
      --
      Ok, I see your point. And I agree that screenshot for my theme (Egypt-Office) on IBM site is not good, at all!
      Unfortunately, there was no option to include "reference" URL with author's screenshot (in IBM KDE Theme Contest).
      I am going to prepare such page ASAP and post URL here.
      In the mean time, pls see attached screenshot from my original submission (no changes from May 31st, 2001!)

      Cheers,
      Vadim
      Click to download attachment Egypt-office.preview.png
      60KB (62438 bytes)

      [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I just wanted to be certain that the code was unmaintainable." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]