Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?
by blashyrkh on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @07:43

ac, you better get your act together man.
I've seen you on gnome-news also.
You're the one always posting controversial stuff.
Now what is "Genius... but will this require you to install GNOME? Not so good..." supposed to mean?
Have you no respect for the gnome-developers?
And no, if you would know what a compiler was, you wouldn't be asking this question...
Didn't you figure out yet, that it's all about the community.
Who cares what DE you like. All the developers are there to give a product to the community. Should you therefore continue to bash them?
Silly man, crawl back in the hole where you came from...

(To other folks, sorry you had to read this, but I've seen this fellow more than once, with no good word coming out of his mouth)

Yours truly,
Pissed of blashyrkh

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by blashyrkh
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?
by ac on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @11:32

Does GNOME require the install of KDE? See that would be bad just like it would be bad if the install of KDE required GNOME. Nothing controversial here. Self-important anti-trollers like you are just as bad as the real trollers.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?
by anti-ac on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @13:48

First of all, Mono doesn't require you to install GNOME as it isn't a part of GNOME.
Second of all, GNOMErs might start using aRts, which IS
actually a part of KDE. There is nothing wrong with either.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?
by Evan "JabberWokky" E. on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @18:03

:: Second of all, GNOMErs might start using aRts, which IS actually a part of KDE.

No offense, but I've heard this for awhile without anybody who states it being able to back it up. Where did this "common knowledge" come from - it's been repeated quite often, but I haven't seen any links to any developers actually discussing it. I'd like to have documentation to potentially back up this.

--
Evan

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Do we have ourselves a little TROLL here?
by iain on Monday 18/Mar/2002, @07:45

There was occasionally talk about using CSL by Stefan and Tim Janik, and that can output to OSS, Arts and Alsa, but no-one seems to know whats going to happen

[ Reply To This | View ]

GNOME and aRts
by aigiskos on Tuesday 19/Mar/2002, @18:47

Weird! Iain replied to you earlier, but his response has disappeared. At any rate, there has been discussion on the GNOME lists (from last August or September, I think) about using aRts. No decision has been made yet, and there is no default sound server/sound system for GNOME 2.0. The developers decided to wait and see how things play out in development between the different contenders. The two front-runners are aRts and GStreamer: the former is a little more mature, while the latter is more integrated with GNOME (it uses GLib). A decision will most likely be made for GNOME 2.2. Cheers!

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"The trick is not to dream of adding a feature, but simply to do it." -- Stefan Westerfeld
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.