faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: python bindings official or alpha ?
by Daniel Lemire on Monday 18/Mar/2002, @12:18
|
Plus, I wasn't able to build the Python binding code, plus it is not included in most (any) distro.
For Python to really make it as a language under KDE, you would need to have support at the core level. That is, you install KDE, you have the Python bindings, period.
http://www.ondelette.com/indexen.html - visit the wavelet forum! |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: python bindings official or alpha ?
by bero on Wednesday 20/Mar/2002, @05:03
|
<i>For Python to really make it as a language under KDE, you would need to have support at the core level. That is, you install KDE, you have the Python bindings, period.</i>
We should not repeat GNOME's mistake of requiring python and probably 200 other languages for a base install just because some applications are written using it. We don't want a 1 GB base install... (Remember that we could do just the same thing for C#, Java, C, Objective-C bindings... There's no real reason why Python is more important than any of those).
It's a sort of chicken and egg problem - distributors will start picking up PyKDE once there are applications for it. Developers will pick up PyKDE once they're aware of it, which is often by seeing it in a distribution.
For a start, I'll add PyKDE in one of the next Red Hat Linux releases; it's too late for the next one, unfortunately.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|