faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Ruby, oh Ruby
by Neil Stevens on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @12:22
|
The Ruby bindings were done with SWIG ( http://www.swig.org/ ) , which doesn't exactly automate the process of writing wrappers around C++ code.
I really doubt bindings will be able to keep up with KDE unless something more efficient comes along. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Ruby, oh Ruby
by Evan "JabberWokky" E. on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @13:20
|
It seems to be that something could be drawn from one of the indexing programs such as lxr. (http://lxr.kde.org/) which automatically parses the classes in KDE. Failing that, the documentation is kept in a structured format, so bindings could be autogenerated from that information, complete with documentation for the bindings.
--
Evan
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Ruby, oh Ruby
by Adam Treat on Sunday 17/Mar/2002, @13:32
|
What you've just described is Kalyptus. It is a modification of KDoc by Richard Dale, and it is excellent. Basically, all of these bindings (Java, C, Objective-C, C#, and perl) are drawn from Richard Dale's work. Look a few posts above and you will find that Richard is working on some new Ruby bindings as we speak.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
