faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Kcontrol Module?
by fault on Sunday 05/May/2002, @15:08
|
| ugh, please don't complicate kcontrol even more. It's been far too cluttered for far too long. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Kcontrol Module?
by Pablo Liska on Monday 06/May/2002, @12:51
|
You mean too functional?
As far as I see it: better to consolidate/organize functions in one place than have hundreds of "uncluttered" programs/files/places that only do one thing.
It would be great if kcontrol did what control panel does in windows, but organized things a bit better, thanks to kparts. Windows 2000 server has this extra section called "computer management" that is like kcontrol (but with less stuff in it and therefore somewhat harder to find and creating more "clutter" -- lots of icons in the admin section of control panel). "Computer Management" includes interfaces for the logical volume manager, the firewal configurator (which btw has a bunch of user-friendly wizards and also allows fine-grained control), user management, etc.
Maybe we should have two kcontrols? one for basic stuff and one for things like this? I think its better to have it in one "place" (not really one place since its just kparts pulling in other progs -- as far as i understand) and just organize things well.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Kcontrol Module?
by Michael on Tuesday 07/May/2002, @09:19
|
> I think its better to have it in one "place" (not really one place since its
> just kparts pulling in other progs -- as far as i understand) and just organize > things well.
Yeah, but it's not better that you decide where we want things.
It's better if we can configure something to put arbitrary things in one place, or not, as we see fit.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|