Re: gcc 3.1

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: gcc 3.1
by Ryan Cumming on Friday 12/Jul/2002, @01:36

The results are a bit dubious, as the -g3 parameter does very different things under GCC 2.95 and GCC 3.1. I suspect that relocating the DWARF symbols that 3.1 produces with -g3 accounts for the extra relocation time. Oh, and GCC 3.1 produces faster code, more friendly warnings and errors, and is more standards compliant. Some people care about more than speed.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Ryan Cumming
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Factories pollute too much, I want something good for the environment." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.