Re: What Smoke is (Re: shameless cheerleading.)

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: What Smoke is (Re: shameless cheerleading.)
by Adam Treat on Tuesday 17/Sep/2002, @16:24

Wow! Looks like you guys have done some *amazing* work with SMOKE and PerlQt. Congratulations!

Regarding the usefullness of smoke for the C# bindings... I'm not sure this is the way to go. We are in the midst of a major refactor of Qt# with the goal to replace libqtc altogether. We've written a custom parser in C# that takes the Qt headers and outputs an xml representation of them. We will then feed this xml into our generator. We are going to replace libqtc with libqtsharp which will contain all the constructors for the QObjects and then we'll call libqt directly by mangling our function names. The idea is to reduce our dependencies and tailor our glue code to meet the specific needs of the CLR.

Anyways, Nice Work: Ashley, David, Everyone

Adam Treat

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Adam Treat
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Time for a make-it-cool branch?" -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.