faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: neato
by Daniel Stone on Thursday 19/Sep/2002, @00:39
|
| The only reason Bugzilla is seen by the masses to be So Much Better than debbugs is because KDE was using an age-old version of Bugzilla (about 3 years old IIRC), and certain people refused offers of help to upgrade it, and implement systems like the PTS, that would completely match (and, IMHO, surpass) Bugzilla. All I can say that the options weren't properly considered; it's like comparing a 1991 Lancer to an SS Commodore, whereas if you used an up-to-date Evo, you'd have a chance against the Commodore ... |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: neato
by not me on Thursday 19/Sep/2002, @03:32
|
I think the reason Bugzilla is seen by the masses to be So Much Better than debbugs is that the masses have never heard of debbugs. I certainly hadn't until you mentioned it just now, even though apparently that's what KDE was using for some time. In contrast, now you can't visit a page at bugs.kde.org without reading the word "Bugzilla" at least three times. Maybe you need to look into ways of getting better branding for debbugs :-)
P.S. I assume you meant "KDE was using an age-old version of _debbugs_," not Bugzilla...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: neato
by David Faure on Thursday 19/Sep/2002, @04:10
|
The biggest problem was that things didn't happen in real time with ddebugs (send mail, wait for answer, pages regenerated the day after...). With bugzilla it's all immediate, thanks to the SQL backend.
Has this changed in ddebugs?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|