Re: Quanta 3.1

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Quanta 3.1
by Eric Laffoon on Friday 11/Oct/2002, @17:33

> Are you in a hurry to rush version numbers like this? :-)

Yes, you got me. Shucks! We were hoping to slip out 5.1 by the end of the year. ;-) Okay, actually it's just our hyper speed programming...

Okay, I'll stop clowning. We have been adding features and haven't got the full feature set we want. We didn't want to have a 3.0 PR7 just to get the features in... so as soon as we had a feature set we were happy with we froze it and shipped 3.0 because we know lots of people don't want to use a pre release and there's no reason to hold it up for features we can do in a point release. So when I contacted Dirk he said he'd like to ship it with KDE 3.1 and when we looked at our code base we could only do a few new features and enhance some of our in process features... so when I asked if we should do a point release one morning as I was waking up I was shouted down for being an idiot as we do have feature improvements... (I really do love this project but I need to be awake when I type as Andras is 10 hours ahead of me.) Of course I knew someone would ask your question.

You get the gold star. Look for version 3.5 later next month. ;-)

Related Links

·   Articles on Applications
·   Also by Eric Laffoon
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Sorry, security is not optional." -- Waldo Bastian
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.