Re: Binary Packages ?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Binary Packages ?
by Mooby on Tuesday 05/Nov/2002, @06:06

Perhaps cooker will get binaries, we got some for RC1.
I think that only having sources doesn't help to have a lot of beta testers.
On the other side, people who get and compile sources will probably send better bug reports.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Mooby
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Binary Packages ?
by Wade on Tuesday 05/Nov/2002, @07:01

> On the other side, people who get and compile sources
> will probably send better bug reports.

Yeah, or they'll send invalid ones due to their inability to compile things properly, or simply having a shafted environment. :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.