faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Correct me if I'm wrong...
by Paul Crowley on Sunday 12/Jan/2003, @16:19
|
Hey, is there any reason KHTML couldn't be made to work for Gnome, the way Galeon brings Mozilla to Gnome?
I don't know who would work on such a politically loaded project, but if the engine is better, why not use it? If it can be ported to Aqua and OS X it can surely be ported to Gnome... |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Correct me if I'm wrong...
by Biswa on Wednesday 15/Jan/2003, @20:43
|
I actually proposed something like this a few months back and there was some discussion over it. We did this before for gtkhtml (it was a port of the original khtml code used in KDE 1.x). But in the end, it was felt that it did not offer compelling advantages over Gecko, which is improving in terms of speed and footprint all the time.
You can read the discussion here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-devel-list/2002-September/msg00059.html
Rgds,
Biswa.
-------------------------------
Hey, is there any reason KHTML couldn't be made to work for Gnome, the way Galeon brings Mozilla to Gnome?
I don't know who would work on such a politically loaded project, but if the engine is better, why not use it? If it can be ported to Aqua and OS X it can surely be ported to Gnome...
----------------------------------
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|