Anyone tried both Juk and Yammi?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

Anyone tried both Juk and Yammi?
by onoelle on Friday 13/Jun/2003, @13:59

As the developer of Yammi (http://yammi.sourceforge.net) I really would like to try Juk, but that won't be before I update my whole system to a current distro (Juk doesn't compile on my current configuration).

Anyone tried both applications? I think their concept is very similar, but I myself think that Juk is much better integrated into KDE (as Yammi, so far, also runs on a QT-only system). But maybe there are some good pieces in Yammi that could find their way into Juk (eg. the fuzzy search)? That's why I would like to hear the opinion of people who tried both...

Related Links

·   Articles on Multimedia
·   Also by onoelle
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Anyone tried both Juk and Yammi?
by AC on Friday 13/Jun/2003, @14:37

The fuzzy search sounds interesting indeed.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Anyone tried both Juk and Yammi?
by surfed on Sunday 07/Dec/2003, @11:21

I have found yammi to be my favourite jukebox as i find interaction and music selection is more refined in it, the only problem is i use it with xmms for crossfading (crossfading is a freaking MUST HAVE on any jukebox) and xmms and yammi never like eachother for more then 10 songs or so.....

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I'd like to turn all users into developers." -- Ralf Nolden
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.