[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: GPL only
by protoman on Wednesday 18/Jun/2003, @03:41
Well said. I can't understand people complaining about Trolltech desisions.
Trolltech is free to, to make the decisions they like or think are right, this includes excluding other licences other than GPL.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Qt
 ·   Also by protoman
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: GPL only
by David Johnson on Wednesday 18/Jun/2003, @11:02
<snip>I can't understand people complaining about Trolltech desisions.</snip>

When Microsoft recently released a license that said in essence "you can't use the GPL", the community was outraged. But when Trolltech says "you must use the GPL" it's okay. I don't see the fundamental difference between the two.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: GPL only
    by protoman on Wednesday 18/Jun/2003, @11:35
    Yep, agreed.
    I think M$ should release anything they have in any license they wish, if this don't brake the law (or previous licenses), I don't see why so much complaining arround there.

    And remember people defends GPL agains the "viral" speech from M$ but attacks m$ right to do the shared source....

    I don't like BSD, I think it's bad (don't worry to reply about this, keep reading...), but that just me. I won't even say anything besides this from anyone who wants to use BSD, and I must always enphasis the "I" in the statement. Simply saying BSD is bad/GPL is bad isn't a nice thing, always remember it's just YOUR option and fights will diminish or vanish.

    Peace people!
    [ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: GPL only
    by tuxo on Thursday 19/Jun/2003, @06:31
    >But when Trolltech says "you must use the GPL" it's okay. I don't see the >fundamental difference between the two.
    The difference is that forcing GPL serves many people, while not allowing GPL serves mainly one big company, in this case M$.
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Njaard was simply NOT designed for Europe." -- Nikolas Zimmermann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]