Re: What I would like to see

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: What I would like to see
by Datschge on Friday 20/Jun/2003, @12:08

Well, I simply dislike superficial comparisations which follow several imo wrong assumptions: That everyone know the features of a comercial program (which costs money) running on a proprietary system (which again costs money) and calling it a "current industry standard" (note the omission of "quasi", and even then Microsoft's Frontpage is probably more widespread...).

In general I'd wish people would stop making the assumption that everyone can easily check out commercial programs legally for looking what "great features" they are missing. Instead more people need to learn to describe missing "killer features" accuratelly and more detailed, when it's really that great developers might get excited as well and implement it after all.

That and the silly name was the reason for my "troll" post. =)

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Office Suite
·   Also by Datschge
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: What I would like to see
by Beefy on Friday 20/Jun/2003, @23:35

I agree.
I've never used DreamWeaver yet, but I'm a web developer, so if it's industry standard, why don't I know it?

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I always have things in progress." -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.