faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Unfortunately there is GTK2
by qtnice_but on Thursday 03/Jul/2003, @09:40
|
Sun and Macromedia are going to like GTK2 ...
GTK2, especially with c++ and c# wrappers shims and what have you, is really good. And it's still being developped and improved, cleaned and ported to native Win32 and Carbon. The advantage of C is it a flexible mess that can be easily ported and optimized :-( And ObjectiveC is the best of all :-(
Qt's *massive* advantage in documentation is gradually being eroded too ...
what to do??!! |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Unfortunately there is GTK2
by anon on Thursday 03/Jul/2003, @15:11
|
> Sun and Macromedia are going to like GTK2 ...
Uhm..? Macromedia uses gtk? That's news to me
>GTK2, especially with c++ and c# wrappers shims and what have you, is really good
gtkmm, for what it's worth, still very much feels like a wrapper unfortunatly.. I agree it has been cleaned up from it's quite messy gtk 1.x days (and is now finally usable), but it doesn't feel like a nice, complete coherent solution like Qt does.
> And it's still being developped and improved, cleaned and ported to native Win32 and Carbon.
While there is a fork of gtk to use carbon, the main one still uses x11 unfortunatly :(
Last time I saw, gtk still doesn't integrate as well as Qt does on win32 either. It doesn't use WindowsXP Visual Styles, but rather uses gtk-engines :(
> The advantage of C is it a flexible mess that can be easily ported and optimized
true, but it's a myth that C++ can't be as portable. after all, Qt works very nice on both MacOS and Windows, and has for years. gtk might have also, but it still doesn't work well on either one.
> And ObjectiveC is the best of all :-(
I personally gind objective-C quite awkward and less powerful compared to C++. I think a lot of other people do, seeing the relative popularity of C++ compared to obj-C. But hey, if I had learned obj-C before C++, I might feel differently.
> Qt's *massive* advantage in documentation is gradually being eroded too ..
Agreed.. time for qt to use doxygen! (which ironically, uses Qt)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|