Re: Bad article, worse comments.

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Bad article, worse comments.
by Flip on Tuesday 23/Sep/2003, @08:33

I'm a geek and proud of it.
Her articles are more directed to the less geek audience. I know what you're criticizing because I see it myself, but keep in mind the audience. She's showing people who are curious about Linux and KDE yet still new at it, what this wonderful OS can do. You're the one who qualifies as a dweeb in this case if you fail to see that. I couldn't care less if she was a man who had 3 sex changes so now resides in the grey area between male and female. What matters is that her articles are well written when it comes to teaching those who are new to KDE about the neat things it can do, without scaring people away with the technical jargon geeks like me are so fond of. Looking forward to seeing some more constructive criticism instead of just random people bashing.

PS: some might have realized this whole paragraphe only states one point 2-3 times over. This was intentional, with goal of getting it to sink in.

Related Links

·   Articles on Savanna Says
·   Also by Flip
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Sorry, security is not optional." -- Waldo Bastian
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.