faq  flatforty  contribute  subscribe  configure  search  rdf  main  parent	QKernelApplication by Justin on Tuesday 26/Aug/2003, @10:22 Yes!! I have been waiting for the gui / non-gui separation. Finally, using Qt in server applications will become a real possibility. And yes I know of TinyQ, but it lacks QObject (and thus the event loop), which Qt 4 will have in the kernel portion. Good stuff!	Related Links  ·   Articles on Qt  ·   Also by Justin  ·   Contact author Thread Threshold: 10 comments 20 comments 30 comments 40 comments 50 comments 60 comments 70 comments 80 comments 90 comments 100 comments 110 comments 120 comments 130 comments 140 comments 150 comments 160 comments 170 comments 180 comments 190 comments 200 comments 300 comments 400 comments 500 comments 1000 comments
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: QKernelApplication by Kevin Krammer on Tuesday 26/Aug/2003, @12:24 You know you just have to pass false to the QApplications constructor to disable GUI, right? [ Reply To This | View ] Re: QKernelApplication by Justin on Tuesday 26/Aug/2003, @12:53 Yep, that's what I do now. The problem is that I still have to bag the whole Qt library, which requires X11 to compile and run, even if I don't use those parts. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: QKernelApplication by Eron Lloyd on Tuesday 26/Aug/2003, @15:28 How good would Qt be at, for example, developing a mail/calendaring/messaging server in? So instead of having Kroupware, which consists of a bunch of third-party servers, you could have a Qt-native groupware server sharing many of the same features supported by the client (Kontact). It would seem Qt's networking support is pretty advanced based on the amount of different KIO protocols that have been developed... Eron [ Reply To This | View ] Re: QKernelApplication by Tim Jansen on Wednesday 27/Aug/2003, @04:38 >>How good would Qt be at, for example, developing a mail/calendaring/messaging server in?<< Should be good enough. Qt's networking support is indeed a weak spot, but it should be enough for TCP. Otherwise you could use thiagom's libqtaddon for this, or in the worst case the low-level socket api. And anyway, networking is just a tiny, almost negligible aspect of servers like that. TCP is trivial, the hard part is to implement the protocol and the data store. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: QKernelApplication by deo on Tuesday 26/Aug/2003, @19:55 have you not used glib or curses before? [ Reply To This | View ] The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply )

		"Would you believe that this little program actually annoys some people?" -- Martin Jones
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.

[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]