Re: KOffice separated from KDE ?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: KOffice separated from KDE ?
by Nicolas GOUTTE on Wednesday 27/Aug/2003, @04:25

I do not thing that it means that KOffice is going its own way. It only menas that Koffice 1.4 will be delayed until KDE 4.0 is out. And I do not think that it is a waste of time, as there is enough bugs and wishes for KOffice.

I do not really understand your comment about the huge re-write. In any case, we do not have any Qt4 (alpha, beta...) right now. So we will have to do the file format switch first and then the Qt4 switch. I still see an opening for a KOffice 1.4 for KDE 3.x if there is really a need.

Have a nice day!

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Office Suite
·   Also by Nicolas GOUTTE
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

I'm all for it!
by Alex on Thursday 28/Aug/2003, @15:37

Sure a rewrite might take a while but that's where innovation really comes from, luckily Linux does not have sucha big user base so we can still afford to break compatibility. One of Microsoft's greatest weaknesses IMO is that they can't break compatibility any time soon.

Also, IMO the advanatages gained from the KDE 1->2 rewrite or GNOME 1->2 rewrite far out weigh the consequences.

Please break compatibiltity if it yilds large advantages. KDE 4 is not a point release, you're meant to break compatibiltiy. but please don't break compatibility between X.X and X.X.X releases. However, KDE 4 will be a X release and we need to let 3.x live longer anyway so the time required to make a rewrite will not be a problem.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: I'm all for it!
by Rayiner Hashem on Friday 29/Aug/2003, @00:59

KDE 4.x will *not* be a rewrite. KDE has kept the same basic architecture since 2.x, and IMHO its a good one. It should be good for at least a couple of more full releases. Stuff that breaks compatibility might be useful, but a full rewrite would just be a waste of perfectly great code. Plus, a large amount of what KDE needs to work on now is not the internal technology (except for maybe replacing aRts!) but UI polish.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Ironically, we are working on that right now!" -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.