[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Fair Use
by red5 on Tuesday 04/Nov/2003, @02:22
<i>Actually, I think they pay big bucks to display that stuff. I don't think Pepsi would want their product displayed in offensive ways.</i><BR>
<BR>
Not really. In the industry they call this product placement and advertizing agencies pay big bucks to major studios for the privilage. The studios then require their productions to show these products on screen.<BR>
<BR>
In Fightclub for example they made a point of putting all the obligitory pepsi vending units in the most unlikely places. Like the ally out back of the convenice store during the "human sacrifice" scene.<BR>
<BR>
I think the reason X files uses an off brand of smokes is becase tabco companies are baned from advertizing on TV in the US.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE Success Story
 ·   Also by red5
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I don't sing in the shower... I play the piano though." -- David Faure
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]