I don't understand...

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

I don't understand...
by Inorog on Sunday 02/Nov/2003, @15:08

... the sense of Jonathan's question about using the GPL icons? Are the KDE artists the least bit interested in producing an alternative 24 episode? Do we really need to alienate (even more than what proprietary proponents manage to) people from actually using and enjoying free software? As long as KDE's brand is used in actually advertising manners, do we care? OK, having a big power's military make a film about extremists using Linux/KDE on their desktops while planning the killing of thousands of innocents would be offensive and we would then try to do something. But even then, why should we be ourselves licensing extremists?

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Success Story
·   Also by Inorog
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: I don't understand...
by Cloaked Pengüin on Monday 03/Nov/2003, @01:33

It's a bad taste joke, directed to the only ones who will care and laugh at it, i.e. KDE developers. Ignore at will :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"That's something I don't know." -- David Faure
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.