Quanta 3.2 Bleeding Edge Announced

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main

Quanta 3.2 Bleeding Edge Announced

Posted by Navindra Umanee on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @11:35
from the web-is-for-everyone dept.
The Quanta team is pleased to announce the Bleeding Edge (BE) branch of Quanta Plus. Quanta 3.2 BE 1 features a number of new improvements including an "awesome new CSS editor", KFileReplace support, auto save and crash recovery, and much more. Note that VPL (WYSIWYG) mode requires kdelibs CVS or the upcoming beta. If you are looking for something to give thanks for this season, or you just like pretty screenshots, the Quanta Plus project is a worthy pick. The Quanta Plus project is supported by your donations.

< | >

Related Links

·   Articles on Applications
·   Also by Navindra Umanee
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Over 40 comments listed. Printing out index only.

VPL Mode
by Anonymous on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @12:04

Any screenshots of this available?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: VPL Mode by Eric Laffoon on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @22:06
Re: VPL Mode by Eric Laffoon on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @05:43

Re: VPL Mode by Lee on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @12:02

Re: VPL Mode by Eric Laffoon on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:37

Re: VPL Mode by tom on Friday 22/Apr/2005, @07:48

Re: VPL Mode by anonymous on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @12:50

Re: VPL Mode by Eric Laffoon on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:09

Compilable on 3.2 Beta?
by Haakon Nilsen on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @13:02

Is this really compilable on KDE 3.2 Beta? make gives me this error:

../document.h:41:42: ktexteditor/editinterfaceext.h: No such file or directory

I do have ktexteditor/editinterface.h, but no editinterfaceext.h. I suspect maybe this was some non-public API that was removed in the beta. Any ideas?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Compilable on 3.2 Beta? by Andras Mantia on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @13:39

beta2?
by tj on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @13:11

I think the "latest beta" is wrong. The page says "upcoming beta2".

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: beta2? by Navindra Umanee on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @13:43

VPL
by Spy Hunter on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @15:42

Where are the screenshots of VPL? How is it coming along? I'm interested in this new Quanta mode.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: VPL by Thorsten Schnebeck on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @17:43

Re: VPL by Eric Laffoon on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @22:14

Re: VPL by Thorsten Schnebeck on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @03:07

Re: VPL by Andras Mantia on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @03:49

Re: VPL by Thorsten Schnebeck on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @06:01

Re: VPL by Andras Mantia on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @07:06
Re: VPL by Eric Laffoon on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @08:56

Re: VPL by Richard Moore on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @04:24

Re: VPL by Eric Laffoon on Saturday 29/Nov/2003, @22:38

why can't we hide the tree views?
by Castanheiro on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @07:14

It's a small thing, but it's one that i miss alot! Why isn't possible to have a colapsable tree view? Something like konqueror has on it's sidebar, if you click on a icon it opens the view, but if you you click on a icon of something already open it colapses the sidebar... Horizontal space (space in general) is very important when you code... and now that quanta have a visual editor it should be more important! it's annoying all that horizontal scroll...
And no.... windows floating around it is not the solution!

Regards

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: why can't we hide the tree views? by Eric Laffoon on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @08:35

Re: why can't we hide the tree views? by Castanheiro on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @13:05

Thank you
by Alex on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @09:20

Quyanta is reallly a fantastic tool, and it's amazing to see the progress it's making in such a short period of time.

Thank you Andras, Eric and other Quanta contributors, your work is greately appreciated!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Quanta and W3C
by Shift on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @16:43

For the Quanta team :
Can you please remove w3c html4 logo on the quanta homepage or correct the page ?
It is not serious to keep the logo and that the website doesn't validate to w3c standards : http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fquanta.sourceforge.net%2F

Much better, you can use XHTML and CSS and remove all the tables used only for design.

Thanks,

Franck

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Quanta and W3C by Jilks on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:50

Re: Quanta and W3C by Jilks on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:54
Re: Quanta and W3C by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @14:08

Re: Quanta and W3C by Jilks on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @10:39

Re: Quanta and W3C by Richard Moore on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @04:21

Re: Quanta and W3C by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @04:42

Re: Quanta and W3C by Shift on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @09:31

Re: Quanta and W3C by Jilks on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @21:11

Re: Quanta and W3C by Shift on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @02:12

Request for Konqueror developers by No Flash Please on Thursday 04/Dec/2003, @07:10

Re: Quanta and W3C by AC on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @05:49

Re: Quanta and W3C by Richard Moore on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @05:59

Re: Quanta and W3C by Jilks on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @07:47

More stars but still no telescope...
by Arkascha on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @00:02

Thanks for the good work once again !
However in my opinion the major problem when working with quanta is not bleeding edge stuff like VPL. It's fun to see how these new features are implemented. But we quit using quanta because of one thing:
Missing support of debugging facilities.
Or has anyone meanwhile succeeded in getting that php debug stuff in quanta to work? Whithout useable support of a debugger quanta is a nice thing, good look and feel, but it's not suitable for real programming tasks.
Once again: thanks for quanta, a good peace of work.
Arkascha

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More stars but still no telescope... by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @13:21

3.2 be vs 3.1.93
by jgraham on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @00:57

exactly how different is this from the 3.1.93 version?

jgraham

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: 3.2 be vs 3.1.93 by Andras Mantia on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @01:12
Re: 3.2 be vs 3.1.93 by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @13:48

Need more concentration on wysiwyg and...
by anonymous gerbil on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @03:25

...modperl...

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Need more concentration on wysiwyg and... by Nick Mailer on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @08:54

Re: Need more concentration on wysiwyg and... by anon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @18:25

Re: Need more concentration on wysiwyg and... by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @20:07

Re: Need more concentration on wysiwyg and... by anon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @23:58

Re: Need more concentration on wysiwyg and... by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @11:34

Click and modify?
by OI on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @04:40

Looking at the last screenshot of the "Quanta BE shots" images...
Is it possible to right-click(or something) in the web-page
and change form parameters?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Click and modify? by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @20:16

Re: Click and modify? by OI on Thursday 04/Dec/2003, @04:58

VPL and CSS
by Pat on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @10:17

I like the VPL and the fact that I can see both the VPL and source at the same time. But it seems like VPL doesn't display my CSS background color and style although the mozilla editor does. how come?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: VPL and CSS by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @11:43

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Ok, maybe my approach is over-engineered." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.