faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Quanta and W3C
by Jilks on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:50
|
Woo! You tell 'em! Yay!
I worked up something a while ago for the site, but Eric didn't accept it. :-(
http://openschooling.org/~jilks/quanta_Web/index.php (Some stuff is broken 'cause I've been playing with CSS, PHP, and bunches of other stuff, but you get the idea.) That site will generate several versions of itself depending on what it -thinks- the browser can handle (it's a great thinker, too). (HTML or XHTML (Strict, and all valid), no, low, or high color graphics, and so on.) Design-wise, it's pretty pimp. Style-wise, it's not so great. All it takes to change it is a little CSS, though. :-)
I still need to figure out a way to show that the XHTML is valid. Viewing in Mozilla tells you it is, but W3C's validator only gets HTML. I'll probably need to force it with a flag or something...
Enjoy! |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Quanta and W3C
by Jilks on Sunday 30/Nov/2003, @22:54
|
Oh, I forgot to mention that some pages don't work due to me not creating them. Also, those pages (that work) should do pretty well accessibility-wise. ;-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Quanta and W3C
by Eric Laffoon on Monday 01/Dec/2003, @14:08
|
Lucky me! Heckled by my own team member. I can't pick on Chris too much because he's done a lot for Quanta... so this is said with kindness...
For the record Chris, as you're posting this publicly without emailing me first. I never rejected what you sent in. I just haven't had time to look at integrating it. I've been too busy. I should also note you volunteered your work without first discussing various criteria and concerns with me, thus creating a need for major changes to use your work. It completely breaks the modular layout I use with PHP. Had you discussed it with me then I'd have given you access to my CVS and discussed objectives. Then we would actually function as a team. Also, the original site was largely done by Alex who was very HTML 3.2 oriented and it was an absolute mess. I cleaned and processed the site and validated it but as the pages are assembled in PHP it seems some of his code has slipped back in. I have a lot of experience in PHP and web development so when I go to implement changes I like to make sure that they don't create problems for me if I want to maintain it.
I'm not trying to be obnoxious. They validated when I tested it, even if they don't now. I found several things in there that are just ugly too that were done before I decided I needed to exclude sloppy coders. It's on my do list but I honestly have so much to do I really need 2-3 of me for my business and another 2-3 of me for KDE/Quanta. So if it really bugs you send a patch.
Before the end of the year I plan to completely revise the site and add online resource search/download/submit directly from within Quanta. I had planned on asking Chris if he'd like to help with this. In the mean time I have had to make public appeals to get the money to pay Andras as recently as last month and now I need to get my business squared away with major revisions on my business site and a big ebay launch so I can stop bleeding money and begging for help and start enjoying discretionary income. I don't even have cable TV because I can't spare the money for it or the time to watch it. I'll get to it this month and that's going to have to be good enough.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Quanta and W3C
by Jilks on Tuesday 02/Dec/2003, @10:39
|
> Heckled by my own team member.
Oh, don't worry about that. I do everyone. :-) Sometimes I even email people randomly that use XHTML + CSS just to say, "Hey, nice to see more and more people using XHTML + CSS! Nice work!"
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
