Re: Sodipodi is real great stuff but...

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Sodipodi is real great stuff but...
by Totoro on Friday 19/Dec/2003, @06:01

> QT is also much better for Porting to Windows.

Yes and no. For a company, it is much better. For an individual, since Qt for windows requires either to run XFree on windows or to pay the Trolltech licence (1500$), it is not that much better.

Having using it as a company, I am more than satisfied. The 30k lines program I ported took me 1 hour of fixes for broken visual C++ code, and 2 days of DLL problem. 0 minutes where dedicating to the port, it just worked.

Related Links

·   Articles on Interviews
·   Also by Totoro
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I guess my process varies from time to time." -- George Staikos
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.