faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
|
X independency lib
by chris on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @01:47
|
| what about a X independency Libary wich translates all calls of KDE apps to X or MAC ? wie can add more displays later like directx or directfb or xouvert or what you cann imagine. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: X independency lib
by Phisiker on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @02:20
|
What about a replacement of the Mac-Interface with a version, which uses X and is binary-compatible? Because of the missing X-support, I don't buy a Mac.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: X independency lib
by Justin on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @03:22
|
Mac OS X 10.3 comes with a built-in X server. It's rootless, so X apps co-exist with native apps. The windows are managed by the OS, so they have proper borders and drop-shadows too. The server itself is easy to manage, just click and go. I was very impressed.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: X independency lib
by Anonymous on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @06:48
|
Actually, the built-in X server can be rooted or rootless, your choice.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: X independency lib
by Mr_boots on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @14:29
|
How about a transparent kitty cat that would be like "meow" and then the hardware will be like WTF? Meow?
hades is my HERO!!!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: X independency lib
by Yo Daddy on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @13:35
|
>How about a transparent kitty cat that would be like "meow" and then the hardware >will be like WTF? Meow?
>hades is my HERO!!!
Whoa - easy on the catnip there, bucko.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: X independency lib
by Mike on Friday 23/Sep/2005, @01:42
|
It also doesn't work very well: poor desktop integration, no menu bar support, all X11 windows get treated as a single group. X11 is simply not a priority to Apple.
And, yes, replacing Quartz with X11 would be a good thing.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: X independency lib
by mikeyd on Friday 23/Sep/2005, @01:20
|
We already have one, it's called Qt
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|