Re: Mac user

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Mac user
by ac on Friday 02/Jan/2004, @12:32

> And even better, Apple could pump development money into KOffice as they did with KHTML.

Good idea...
Still I hope that one day the same khtml tree is used for konqueror and
safari. Right now it feels that khtml is hanging significantly behind safari,
even that IIRC all of the initial apple patches have been merged.
There has been a lot of work going into safari after...

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE on Unix and other platforms
·   Also by ac
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Mac user
by Southpaw on Wednesday 17/Nov/2004, @15:07

I agree. KDE natively on mac is worth investing in any day of the week. Well, at least the days there's some extra money, lol.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.