Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by Datschge on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @02:02

No, Trolltrech's official Qt's as well as KDE's Qt-copy patches (Qt/X11 only) are the only "leading" sources. Feel free to get what you want by giving them the support they ask you to give. If you don't want to do so and instead limit yourself to your own egocentrical needs don't blame others for doing the same.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE on Unix and other platforms
·   Also by Datschge
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by ac on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @02:31

Look, Trolltech tells on their site being cross-platform, but what this really seems to mean is: let uss create "leading" sources and let others do the porting which might or might not work. Those doing the porting cannot earn money which we CAN make from their porting by requering money for non GPL code.

All this is not really Qt pursuing being cross-platform in my book. If you call all this "me limiting myself in my own egocentric needs" then so be it!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by agsnu on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @03:28

What exactly are you on about? Trolltech developed and maintains all of their own ports, AFAICT.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by cm on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @06:44

I guess there's some confusion here:

AFAIK:
- There's the win version of Qt3 which is a native version completely
written by Trolltech, *not* available under the GPL.
and
- then there's the cygwin version which is a port of the GPLed X11
version of Qt. This port has nothing to do with Trolltech.

So Trolltech writes and maintains the versions they claim to.
But:
> and kde-cygwin certainly does seem *NOT* seem to be a Qt lead project."

It's certainly not a Trolltech project. No one claimed that.
If you want Trolltech's win version of Qt you'll have to buy it.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by ac on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @08:59

Yes it seems I was wrong on the part where I thought Trolltech could make money of other peoples porting work.

The last post does indicate Trolltech hardly directly supports or encoureges GPL software under windows using their Qt library, I just think that's a sorry state of affairs. A different approach on Trolltechs part could move many more developers to start using Qt for cross platform stuff.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about native Cocoa KDE port?
by Datschge on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @23:24

I'm sure Trolltech might consider again releasing a GPL'ed Qt/Win when a KDE release on OSX should considerably increase the number of commercial Qt/Mac licencees. If that doesn't happen then a GPL'ed Qt/Win is very unlikely in the future considering the very bad experience with the previous free version.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I always have things in progress." -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.