Re: Freedom of Software protected by GPL -- not BS

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Freedom of Software protected by GPL -- not BS
by Datschge on Saturday 03/Jan/2004, @22:50

I chose "give" since GPL is strictly a source distribution enforcement license.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE on Unix and other platforms
·   Also by Datschge
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Freedom of Software protected by GPL -- not BS
by Kurt Pfeifle on Sunday 04/Jan/2004, @02:20

OK -- I can see your point

My "give and take" is meant to express that the GPL is more "balanced", in that it asks, in a way, for a return from the receiver of Free Software, should he more than just use it (re-distribute modified or un-modified).

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"My hobbies include, well, coding... and uhm... that's about it." -- Daniel M. Duley
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.