Re: Why Xfree and not Xserver?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Why Xfree and not Xserver?
by Anonymous on Friday 27/Feb/2004, @00:41

XFree86 is established and has more hardware drivers.

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Anonymous
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Why Xfree and not Xserver?
by janne on Friday 27/Feb/2004, @05:09

Windows is more established and it has more hardware-drivers, maybe we should all concentrate on improving Windows instead of concentrating on Linux?

Just because something is "established" is not a good enough reason to think about replacement. Xfree may be "established", and it shows! it's developement is stagnating. Without any competition, they have no reason to really improve.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Why Xfree and not Xserver?
by chris on Friday 20/Aug/2004, @11:28

we cant concentrate on improving Windows

windows certainly has no competition, it's developement is stagnating.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I'd like to turn all users into developers." -- Ralf Nolden
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.