The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 09/Mar/2004, @10:44
|
> I am not opposed to coders above 47. Perhaps they could help us with cobol bindings...
> :-)
Try fortran, if I could remember back that far. ;-)
> In software development via internet nobody cares about your age, race, gender.
...except you when you see your picture and say "I look like that?!? I'm going to the gym now!" ;-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Erik Pedersen on Tuesday 09/Mar/2004, @11:18
|
I am not a coder, but I have translated for KDE to Danish since 98.
And I am 58
Erik
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 09/Mar/2004, @11:28
|
> I am not a coder, but I have translated for KDE to Danish since 98. And I am 58
When Andras told me he was like an old man at age 27 among KDE developers I thought I might be the oldest. Now I'm just old for the KDE crowd. I think counting translators is only fair. Now I'm not as old on the bell curve thanks to Erik. I submit to your years and salute you for obviously thinking young.
BTW I have confirmed users in their late 60s. One is a retired professor who loves Quanta (and Kitty Hooch).
Now about the ponytail... ;-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yes yes...
by David Johnson on Tuesday 09/Mar/2004, @12:01
|
Hey, I resemble that remark! My first formal language was Fortran IV. I still have my "Fortran Coloring Book"...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Roberto Alsina on Tuesday 09/Mar/2004, @13:04
|
Ha! I did Fortran III+ on a PDP11.
Using a paper terminal (ok, one of those and two glass ttys)
And that was my third language (basic and 6510 asm were the first two)
Sometimes living in a poor(ish) country gives you strange bragging rights :-)
BTW: before someone gets a wrong idea, I am only semi-old, being 32
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Richard Dale on Wednesday 10/Mar/2004, @03:35
|
"I am not opposed to coders above 47. Perhaps they could help us with cobol bindings..."
Thanks, no problem - that sounds someone just like me.. I wonder if I'm the only KDE Cobol expert? I used to work on tools to convert one dialect of COBOL into another. Coding sheets/punched cards/flowchart templates - it was all as crap as it sounds!
The best COBOL in my opinion was Burroughs '68 - it had some nifty message passing features - great on an early sixties B5500. It well downhill with the '74 version, and got 'too standard'.
-- Richard, aged 47 and a half.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yes yes...
by Eric Laffoon on Wednesday 10/Mar/2004, @10:53
|
> -- Richard, aged 47 and a half.
Wow! I am so not alone now. You guys are making me feel less odd and more like one of the crowd. ;-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
