[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: hmmm
by Anonymous on Monday 29/Mar/2004, @06:13
It's of course non-profit but not yet accepted as such by the financial authorities.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Applications
 ·   Also by Anonymous
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: hmmm
by cm on Monday 29/Mar/2004, @22:17
Are you also talking about German financial authorities?

I thought they *were* accepted there:
From http://kde.org/areas/kde-ev/corporate/statutes-en.php :

3. Non-profit status of the association
The association pursues according to section 2 of the statutes exclusively and directly non-profit activities according to the section Tax Abatement of the Abgabenordnung (Paragraphs 51 AO). It is acting non-selfish and is not pursuing profit
[...]
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: hmmm
    by Anonymous on Monday 29/Mar/2004, @23:17
    > Are you also talking about German financial authorities?

    Sure. Only the place where the association is registered matters.

    > I thought they *were* accepted there:

    Pursuance of one side is not equal with acceptance of the other side.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: hmmm
      by cm on Tuesday 30/Mar/2004, @07:20
      You cannot register an association in Germany without a statute.
      The statute of KDE e.V. states that KDE e.V. is a non-profit
      association.
      AFAIK *before* you register an association in Germany
      that's supposed to be non-profit you have to consult
      the financial authorities or you cannot register it with that statute.
      That's part of the registration process...

      How can the KDE e.V. be registered if its statute states false things?

      IANAL, though, and of course something I stated may be wrong...
      What am I missing?
      [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: hmmm
        by Anonymous on Tuesday 30/Mar/2004, @09:01
        > AFAIK *before* you register an association in Germany that's supposed to be non-profit you have to consult the financial authorities or you cannot register it with that statute.

        You're wrong, and statutes can be changed. KDE e.V.'s initial statutes didn't met the requirements of the financial authorities so there were consultations with them what has to be changed and the statutes were voted in Nove Hrady. Sadly they're not active yet.

        > How can the KDE e.V. be registered if its statute states false things?

        Registration at court and acceptance by financial authorities are two different processes as they're two different entities.
        [ Reply To This | View ]
        • Re: hmmm
          by cm on Tuesday 30/Mar/2004, @11:59
          > KDE e.V.'s initial statutes didn't met the requirements of the financial
          > authorities so there were consultations with them what has to be changed and
          > the statutes were voted in Nove Hrady. Sadly they're not active yet.

          Ah ok.


          > Registration at court and acceptance by financial authorities are two
          > different processes as they're two different entities.

          Yes, of course, but I would still have expected the court to reject the
          registration of an association that claims in its statute
          to be non-profit but is not (yet) accepted by the
          financial authorities... but I seem to be wrong.

          Fscking legal stuff...
          [ Reply To This | View ]
          • Re: hmmm
            by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 30/Mar/2004, @12:23
            > Fscking legal stuff...

            Exactly! I don't know all the German statutes (though I believe the e.V. complies), but here in the US it's none too simple either. That's why it is expensive and complicated to set up. In partial justification, governments do need to make it's not easy to set up "the church of drinking beer" by mail and open a tax exempt bar in your garage. ;-)
            [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "You would know that after informal research, KDE developers prefer tea!" -- Roberto Alsina
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]