faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: scribus
by David on Saturday 03/Apr/2004, @11:43
|
I don't think it looks that odd - it is a Qt program. You should try running Office 2000 (or even Office XP/2003) or VS.NET under Windows XP. VS.NET is weird, as you expect to develop with XP widgets but you don't. There are a tonne of applications that just do not fit in look-and-feel wise at all. Different buttons, scroll-bars, you name it.
I think people overplay the 'integrated' desktop thing sometimes. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: scribus
by David Johnson on Monday 05/Apr/2004, @11:13
|
If Scribus is to be "kdeified", the current Qt-only interface should still remain as an option. An application that doesn't really need kdelibs shouldn't make it a dependency for people who don't use KDE. Think of AbiWord which can be built with or without Gnome, as an example. A "--with-kde" option during configure would be nice, and even used by default if KDE was detected. But I get the impression that Scribus is meant to be a standalone application regardless of your desktop.
I have an application of my own that is Qt-only, and I've thought on this issue for several years. Since it always annoys me to have to "suck in" several megabytes of Gnome libraries to run a single Gnome application like Dia, why should I annoy my Gnome users by making them suck in several megabytes of KDE libraries? I also have many Windows and Mac users, and making them suck in Cygwin, Fink, and/or XFree86 is going to scare a lot of them away.
I understand both sides of the issue, and I am not advocating non-integration with KDE. But I would like people to know that there's another viewpoint.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|