The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: MFC
by Anonymous on Monday 12/Apr/2004, @08:06
|
> Why do qt programs look different from kde programs?
Do they? If then because they use a different style? Because they use a static version of Qt which doesn't allow to load Qt style plugins?
> what is the real difference of KDe and qt programs.
KDE programs are subclassed from KDE classes while Qt programs are subclassed from Qt. KDE programs are thus enriched with more features (sophisticated file dialog, print system, toolbar editor, new widgets, ...).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: MFC
by Philippe Fremy on Monday 12/Apr/2004, @08:24
|
MFC and Qt do exactly the same thing, so no, there is no binding from one to the other as it would not make sense.
Under java, it is possible to use a Qt implemenation of awt. It is also possible to use Qt directly as an awt/swing alternate implementation but it will only work on unix, unless you have the expensive version of Qt for windows.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: MFC
by Damjan on Thursday 15/Apr/2004, @03:48
|
> Under java, it is possible to use a Qt implemenation of awt
Where is this QT-AWT implementation? Is it free-software?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|