Re: The .ORG Village

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: The .ORG Village
by Chris Howells on Friday 23/Apr/2004, @15:17

No idea, bribing the .organiser maybe? :)

I guess it was just envisioned that they would have the largest number of people visiting and therefore they should get the nicest place to go. Which I think is unfair -- the other stands would have had more visitors had they actually been nicer :)

While I certainly enjoyed the expo for its social aspects (was greating meeting other kde-gb people and having a drink or two or ten with them afterwards), I don't feel that things went generally as well as the last expo.

Oh well I'm doing a bit of thinking and having a look at ways that it could be improved.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Success Story
·   Also by Chris Howells
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: The .ORG Village
by George Wright on Saturday 24/Apr/2004, @03:57

Yes, the size of the Debian booth was unfair; perhaps that's why JD spent so much time there? :)

The expo wasn't too bad - I agree that the booth was pretty rubbish though, and the less said about the wireless internet the better... Still, we had our Irn Bru and IRC - what more could a geek want?

George

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I just wanted to be certain that the code was unmaintainable." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.