faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Quanta.sf.net
by Eric Laffoon on Thursday 06/May/2004, @16:15
|
> Hi Eric. We all are really thankful for your great support for Quanta. But the website makes someone who never used the program wonder in what league Quanta is playing quality-wise.
That's why I had an announcement on the dot that we are developing a new site. No matter how many time I say it people will miss it until it goes on line. The process for what my actual vision for doing a site right takes months, and even with others doing it it still takes even more of my precious time. People feel I should do something, probably because I haven't quite done enough. ;-) You can help.
http://mail.kdewebdev.org/mailman/listinfo/kdewebdev-site
> It is small stuff like the header (http://quanta.sourceforge.net/images/sechdr.png)
I don't remember how long ago I did that. I guess it doesn't look spectacular and I could do better but it's still subjective. Everyone who has offered to help has offered to do the whole thing. Why is it so hard for people to grasp that I'm going to be stuck maintaining it or finding someone to maintain it?
> and typos like the following ...
Fixed, thanks. My fingers don't work so well at 3:30 AM. I got to bed at 5 AM.
> Just let the world know...
Oh if only you could be in my shoes for a release. ;-)
(wait, I'm not wearing shoes) I've "let the world" know repeatedly. I'm also very busy with kittyhooch.com. I don't want to work on quanta.sf.net but I put a header on the main page saying it's being replaced so that people will stop asking me to fix it. Working on two sites for quanta is pointless.
Let's talk about Quanta, the site is in work. |
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
