Re: Performance ?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Performance ?
by MandrakeUser on Thursday 08/Jul/2004, @10:56

Thanks Ben, looking forward to it ! This, together with a standard objprelink for Linux, plus KDE-libs optimizations, will overall get an even snappier KDE !!!!!!

Related Links

·   Articles on Qt
·   Also by MandrakeUser
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Performance ?
by Evan "JabberWokky" E. on Thursday 08/Jul/2004, @12:07

Being slightly pedantic: objprelink has nothing to do with Linux, it addresses an issue with gcc's C++ implementation. Any system that uses gcc will be subject to the same problem. If you use a different C++ complier for Linux (does anybody?), you don't have the problem. And yes, gcc has addressed the problem directly, so it's an issue that will fade away.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Performance ?
by a.c. on Thursday 08/Jul/2004, @19:33

>Being slightly pedantic:

You are correct in all of this.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.