[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: KFirefox?
by Illissius on Saturday 11/Sep/2004, @12:40
I agree. File manager and web browser should be two apps with a lot in common, rather than the same app except configured differently. Or even just giving seperate sets of preferences for the two would be enough...
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Konqueror
 ·   Also by Illissius
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KFirefox?
by Roberto Alsina on Saturday 11/Sep/2004, @12:51
Uh... you can do that already.

Please lookup the docs for Konqueror profiles.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KFirefox?
    by ac on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @08:19
    We've already done this. Yes, starting Konq the web browser can be made to have a different starting page than Konqueror the file manager. But when you hit the Home button in the web browser, suddenly you're browsing the filesystem. The docs for Konqueror profiles are silent on this subject (which is part of why I use Mozilla instead)
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: KFirefox?
      by Roberto Alsina on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @08:39
      Ok, that's trickier, but not impossible.

      * Create a plugin that simply goes to your home folder (that's the hard step ;-)

      * That plugin should now be available to add as a button in the toolbars

      * On the web profile, use the "Home" action in the toolbar

      * On the file manager profile, use the new plugin

      Tada!
      [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: KFirefox?
        by ac on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @14:47
        I appreciate that a solution can be created, but I prefer my one-step solution: 1) Don't use Konqueror for anything but file browsing until this is fixed.
        [ Reply To This | View ]
        • Re: KFirefox?
          by Roberto Alsina on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @15:00
          Had you been any less of an asshole about it, I would have published the plugin, since I just wrote it. Your loss.
          [ Reply To This | View ]
          • Re: KFirefox?
            by CE on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @15:29
            He isn't the only one who thinks that this behaviour is weird.
            It would be great if it'll get fixed.
            [ Reply To This | View ]
            • Re: KFirefox?
              by Roberto Alsina on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @16:49
              It's a solution, sure, but it's also a dirty hack. May publish it on friday if I have any free time.
              [ Reply To This | View ]
          • Re: KFirefox?
            by ac on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @15:39
            Can you not fix some CSS bugs that have been bothering me too? I just want to see how unhelpful I can make you.
            [ Reply To This | View ]
            • Re: KFirefox?
              by Roberto Alsina on Monday 13/Sep/2004, @16:03
              No, since that would involve actual work, instead of editing the example konqueror plugin and changing ten lines of code.
              [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "We've been wondering, are Andreas Pour and Navindra Umanee the same person?" -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]