faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Wow..
by anon on Saturday 11/Sep/2004, @13:25
|
Absolutely not..
1. there are only a few khtml developers anyways (e.g, less than 5 of them)
2. only one major open-source engine is not good
3. khtml has a more elegant design and probably has more expansion possiblities in the future. I bet khtml gets things like WebForms much quicker than Gecko does. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Wow..
by fake on Saturday 11/Sep/2004, @13:48
|
agreed.. and, IMHO, the most important thing is: having our own html rendering engine can give us the ability to add features, and integrate them fully in KDE, without having to rely on an external (and cross-platform) project.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Wow..
by Michael Jahn on Saturday 11/Sep/2004, @14:14
|
Yes, I agree with all of the arguments made. Well, at the very least it is an impressive feat and choices don't hurt anybody. Thanks, devs :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Wow..
by FJ on Sunday 12/Sep/2004, @10:39
|
well.. i don't agree.
the future is: cross-platform. and gecko has it
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Wow..
by Andre Somers on Sunday 12/Sep/2004, @10:46
|
Thanks for allowing all of us a glance in that glass bowl of yours.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Wow..
by anon on Sunday 12/Sep/2004, @10:52
|
What is wrong with the cross-platformness of khtml? It's already the defacto native browser of OSX, the native engine of the most popular Linux desktop, and will be arriving in Windows soon.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|