faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Cool
by koos on Thursday 23/Sep/2004, @17:51
|
> C++ is much more complex than C
Yeah, try reading the boost libraries. Even the STL files, in/usr/include/c++/, can be hard to follow. But don't get me wrong, the result is _very_ powerfull both in features as in speed. But indeed KDE's includes are easy to read.
Actually I was quite happy to only have to recompile libfam and Qt/KDE, when upgrading gcc from 3.3 to 3.4. Not to mention the compile time difference. Long live C, and may every library, that I don't have to use, be implemented in C. And which I do use, well mostly it doesn't really matter.
What's really a swamp is building on top of win32, because you don't know what beneath you (and you get sucked away as soon as it becomes too popular). |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Cool
by stl on Thursday 23/Sep/2004, @18:09
|
I find the stl easier to read than most C libraries(lets say glib). Qt/KDE you can almost read like a book.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Cool
by koos on Friday 24/Sep/2004, @02:17
|
You probably choose the most expensive super market, because the vinegar is much cheaper there then the bordeaux wines from price fighter mega store next door :-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Cool
by stl on Friday 24/Sep/2004, @15:20
|
No, I chose to drive a car(C++) rather than riding on a horse(C) to work.
But seriously, I know it is hard to compare C libs to C++ libs because there is not very often 2 libraries for the same thing. I chose stl vs glib, because they do roughly the same, I/O, containers, string.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|