[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: D-BUS replaces Bonobo?
by Richard Dale on Thursday 23/Sep/2004, @16:23
I had a conversation with you at aKademy where you said you had reservations about the serialisation that DBUS used, and I couldn't quite understand what you thought the problem was. But it sounds to me as though you're more enthusistiac about DBUS than you were then. I agree that CORBA is a complete dog, but perhaps using IIOP might not be a bad idea as a transport layer, which java RMI also uses I believe. Does anyone know what the pros and cons were of choosing the marshalling used by DBUS over IIOP, or DCOP's QDataStream stuff?
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Qt
 ·   Also by Richard Dale
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: D-BUS replaces Bonobo?
by Anonymous Coward on Friday 24/Sep/2004, @07:02
The main problem with this is that IIOP is primarily designed for *networked* procedure calls, while the primary use case for DCOP/DBUS is IPC between processes running on the *same machine*.

Using a fundamentally network-oriented framework such as CORBA as transport for an accessibility toolkit (the most local thing you could imagine) indeed appears as, hmm, a bit of a strange idea. You'd think the pain of developping against GNOME's CORBA madness of an API would have taught a lesson or two...
[ Reply To This | View ]
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I guess my process varies from time to time." -- George Staikos
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]