[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: KOffice: a big promise
by Boudewijn Rempt on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @04:30
The main problem with developing an office suite as a volunteer effort, as opposed to either buying existing source and opening that up (OO) or buying developers (MS-Office), is that many developers hardly use office software to any great extent. It's not that often that I have to write something that needs a word processor; all design documents at our company are docbook, for instance. If I use a spreadsheet it's for making simple lists. Emacs does that, too. I never use a database, I never generate reports. I seldom have to do a presentation, but from the big four apps, presentation software is what I use most often. When I seldom have a need for a word processor, spreadsheet or presentation app, I don't feel the need to hack on those.

But KOffice also has a diagrammer, a vector paint app and a paint app. I need a diagrammer really often. I use Kivio almost daily for my work, and Krita and Karbon are apps I use for fun -- and while I started working on Krita, I'm currently touching Kivio and Karbon, too. And I don't need to hack on KPresenter, because that app already does everything _I_ want from it.

As for features: KOffice not only has relatively few developers, the developers that do work on KOffice have had to spend a whole lot of time on something that's not visible as features or bug fixes, namely moving to the Oasis file format.

However, judging by activity on koffice-devel, there's active development on many KOffice compenents again. What's still sorely missing is someone who really wants to get their hands dirty on KWord. And it's such a nice, interesting application... An editor on steroids, and which developer doesn't want to work on an editor?
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Interviews
 ·   Also by Boudewijn Rempt
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KOffice: a big promise
by devians on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @06:20
You might probably right concerning the developer's attitude. I would likely accept it if I didn't see the OOo case. There is an active community around OOo. They somehow organize themself and provided a significant and continous improvement of OOo.
I have the feeling if KOffice had the same human resource it would be light years ahead.
The question remains: what does OOo do better and how ?
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KOffice: a big promise
    by Boudewijn Rempt on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @06:26
    They have a lot of paid, full-time developers to do the less interesting work.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KOffice: a big promise
    by JohnFlux on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @11:20
    Last I checked, there was a total of 8 outside developers that have ever done anything at all meaningful to openoffice. It's almost all done internally.
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I always have things in progress." -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]