Re: SuSE 9.2

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: SuSE 9.2
by Datschge on Wednesday 06/Oct/2004, @16:48

The absence of any mention of a Personal version is "interesting".

Related Links

·   Articles on Interviews
·   Also by Datschge
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: SuSE 9.2
by Daniel Molkentin on Wednesday 06/Oct/2004, @17:07

It's not. There is no SUSE 9.2 Personal edition.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: SuSE 9.2
by SomeGuy on Wednesday 06/Oct/2004, @17:22

I'm glad, 9.1 Personal Edition was an abomination to me :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: SuSE 9.2
by ac on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @05:01

SUSE 9.1 Personal was KDE only with Kontact, Konqueror, KDE/OOo. So I guess Novell put a stop to that.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: SuSE 9.2
by Anonymous on Thursday 07/Oct/2004, @06:37

Or it didn't pay off the additional efforts (creation, handbook, package, shipping, advertizing) for it. Note that if it's all but the first of this reasons there may be still a downloadable version as currently under different name.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.