faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: [OT] Beautyfing KDE
by Greg on Thursday 14/Oct/2004, @08:20
|
More importantly, quanta only touches a portion of the web developer group. I've tried using it before, and while a nice app, it doesn't provide any features that I have seen that make me want to use it. It also lacks split screen editing, a critical feature in my book.
Greg |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: [OT] Beautyfing KDE
by superstoned on Monday 18/Oct/2004, @06:02
|
try it again
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: [OT] Beautyfing KDE
by Greg on Monday 18/Oct/2004, @09:36
|
The last time I compiled it was last month, and it still really didn't seem to give me much over kate. I did like the project support, it felt a bit more natural than kate's project support. What is it that I'm missing? Quanta seems to be good at document markup, but that's all I see.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: [OT] Beautyfing KDE
by superstoned on Monday 18/Oct/2004, @11:18
|
well, for me the wysiwyg support is very nice... but indeed, for just editting pages, kate is very nice too. but if you want to work with php, quanta is very good. and the templates and wizards can get you going very fast.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: [OT] Beautyfing KDE
by Greg on Monday 18/Oct/2004, @12:17
|
I guess that's the difference for me. I do a lot of work in PHP, but it is very rare that I ever touch HTML in the course of my coding.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|