The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by Anonymous on Wednesday 13/Oct/2004, @23:55
|
www.xdelta.org is the right site, be sure to pick up xdelta 1.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by AC on Thursday 14/Oct/2004, @00:06
|
Perhaps:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/xdelta/
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by Val on Thursday 14/Oct/2004, @02:07
|
Yup, I found it. It has stable version dated by 2001. So I tried it and it worked.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by Val on Sunday 17/Oct/2004, @21:39
|
BTW, doaes someone have an idea why xdelta's are for .tar, not .tar.bz2? I think the latter would be much more convenient...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by Anonymous on Sunday 17/Oct/2004, @23:28
|
The xdelta files created for the tar files are smaller.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: xdelta newbie question
by Brian Harring on Saturday 12/Mar/2005, @01:23
|
Delta compression (differencing) sucks against compressed files- a single byte change in the new version can result in all bytes after N in the output stream differing.
Differencers are ran against uncompressed data, then the patch is compressed (automatically with xdelta) to minimize the patch size....
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|