Thanks for the digest ^

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

Thanks for the digest ^_^
by koral on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @07:17

Once more thanks, Derek :-)
Talking about khtml, I love the new improvements. I just updated khtml and went to the only page that looks messed up on my system: www.skype.com (look at the 2 background lines not in place). Surprise!! It was fixed!
Now finding some pages that don't render good in my everyday usage seems a very hard problem (;-).. Getting eagle-eye now.. ^_^

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by koral
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by John van Spaandonk on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @07:30

I can help (with khtml from kde 3.3),

First of all I agree completely that it is lovely that there is at least some
activity around khtml. And let me add to that that i sincerely hope that
they catch up with at least the standard set by Safari.

Now some examples of pages that still do not render right.

One example is the page I used to compose this reply. (the form boxes
did not render completely until I clicked in them)

In addition, look to:
http://www.nrc.nl (javascript menu's do not render at all)
www.interpolis.nl (no javascript menus)

http://mail.beteor.nl/servlet/webacc (large white space on top of the page)

www.dpreview.com (javascript menus rendered so that you have to click at
a line of 1 pixel before the menus expand)

I could go on (and yes, a long time ago I provided bug reports of most of
these errors)

Could you confirm that these pages now render correctly?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Anonymous on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @08:32

> Now some examples of pages that still do not render right.

Please don't duplicate http://bugs.kde.org on this site.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Wilco on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @08:39

The javascript problems are all solved when you change your browser identification to Mozilla or Safari. Guess where the problem is.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by John van Spaandonk on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @11:39

Wilco,

I guess you did not actually try it?

Or you are doing something else apart from changing
the user string.
For me changing to mozilla does not help
www.interpolis.nl at all.
At www.nrc.nl something is happening with the menus
but they are placed totally wrong.

But again, I am thankful for any improvements that are
made and this is not to complain at all!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Wilco on Monday 25/Oct/2004, @07:16

I certainly tried them out before commenting. The menus on both the Interpolis and NRC site work (and are usable) when identifying as Mozilla 1.6. I'm running KDE CVS, so perhaps KHTML has improved already since KDE 3.3.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by John van Spaandonk on Monday 25/Oct/2004, @08:57

That's great to hear!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by peter van dinther on Tuesday 08/Feb/2005, @12:43

Hoi John,

Via jeeves vond ik mail van jou op zoeknaam 'Beteor'. Grappig he?

Peter

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Heiko on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @07:59

Too bad.
Now Khtml gets better and better from version to version and there are plans to use the gecko engine as a kpart for konqueror.

I hope khtml will stay alive and active as before.
I love it!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Anonymous on Sunday 24/Oct/2004, @08:33

> Now Khtml gets better and better from version to version and there are plans to use the gecko engine as a kpart for konqueror.

As optional "plugin" - so why do you care?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Heiko on Monday 25/Oct/2004, @00:45

I hope nobody says "Why should we put so much work in two different html renderers? Let us focus on the gecko..."

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by Anonymous on Monday 25/Oct/2004, @02:32

Don't worry, it seems that the start of the Mozilla/Qt project has awaken old and new khtml developers.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Thanks for the digest ^_^
by gerd on Monday 25/Oct/2004, @04:47

For me the question arises why there should not be a safari port to windows :-) hehe.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"That's something I don't know." -- David Faure
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.