[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: A better website for Kolab
by me on Sunday 30/Jan/2005, @19:56
I've read about that, too. From the paper it looks like Kolab is targetting fat-client installations (web interface near to impossible due to offline IMAP4 requirement) with 100.000 and above (overkill for installations <1000?). On the other side the only reference which uses Kolab seems to be the German BSI which sponsors the whole project. BSI might be some hundreds of users at best and certainly doesn't count as a "larger installation".

Are there actually any _large_ Kolab installations? I suppose it would be really great if some references (besides BSI) would be posted in the followup article! So far it sounds like a university research project and I guess people wanting to switch from Exchange are curious about real world examples!

PS: for a large installation I would rather ensure that the mentioned services are maintained by one of the bigger Linux companies which have sufficient resources to ensure proper QA, like in SLES 9 or RedHat AS (or Debian if you want to go for free).
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Interviews
 ·   Also by me
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: A better website for Kolab
by Carlo on Tuesday 01/Feb/2005, @08:07
>BSI might be some hundreds of users at best and certainly doesn't count as a "larger installation".

The german authorities do have "a few" hundred thounsand employees...
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: A better website for Kolab
    by me on Tuesday 01/Feb/2005, @16:26
    The German "authorities" do not use Kolab, only BSI is known to actually use it (as mentioned, some deployment examples would be cool for the next article). The current Linux migration guide for German authorities list a lot of groupware servers.

    BTW: Besides there are no really "big" German authorities given that this is a federal republic with a lot of smaller ministries (usually some hundreds of users, only sometimes a few thousand). Quite different to for example France where you have huge ministries (with more than 100.000 employees in a single location).
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I can't describe the scene as this is a G-rated site, but think Pulp Fiction." -- Sirtaj Singh Kang
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]