faq  flatforty  contribute  subscribe  configure  search  rdf  main  parent  thread	Re: Evolution is better for enterprices... by U on Monday 31/Jan/2005, @09:53 >> No, you are mixing that with the Qt/non-commerical licence for Windows. Exactly, and since 90% of the world pc users use Windows, they are atached to this license, that's the big problem.	Related Links  ·   Articles on Interviews  ·   Also by U  ·   Contact author Thread Threshold: 10 comments 20 comments 30 comments 40 comments 50 comments 60 comments 70 comments 80 comments 90 comments 100 comments 110 comments 120 comments 130 comments 140 comments 150 comments 160 comments 170 comments 180 comments 190 comments 200 comments 300 comments 400 comments 500 comments 1000 comments
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: Evolution is better for enterprices... by Kevin Krammer on Monday 31/Jan/2005, @10:03 I fail to see the problem. Kolab runs on Unix/Linux systems, the communication with the server does not require Qt, so there is no need to use Qt on Windows if you want to access the Kolab server. Very likely the most used Kolab client under Windows is currently Outlook with one of the connector plugins. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: Evolution is better for enterprices... by U on Monday 31/Jan/2005, @10:16 >>> Very likely the most used Kolab client under Windows is currently Outlook with one of the connector plugins. That's the answer I needed, thank you. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: Evolution is better for enterprices... by blacksheep on Monday 31/Jan/2005, @12:55 > Very likely the most used Kolab client under > Windows is currently Outlook with one of the > connector plugins. You've just reached his point. :D [ Reply To This | View ] Re: Evolution is better for enterprices... by Kevin Krammer on Monday 31/Jan/2005, @13:57 How so? His point is that Kolab can't be successful because he thought it would put a Qt dependency on its usage, which it does not as I explain and what he acknowledge. So this means we have reached the point where we both agree that Kolab is going to be successful because it can be used by a number of different clients on different systems, even allowing the use of already deployed clients and just changing the PIM server. [ Reply To This | View ]   The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply )

		"We've been wondering, are Andreas Pour and Navindra Umanee the same person?" -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.

[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]