Re: How about a set of truly Pythonic bindings?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: How about a set of truly Pythonic bindings?
by Roey Katz on Friday 18/Feb/2005, @22:34

Right, that issue crossed my mind. But then, why not have two parallel bindings, just like Apple does with cocoa and carbon?

Of course, it would still be a huge undertaking as you say.
And speaking of adding new documentation... well, I think that the autogenerated documentation is not sufficient for someone who is approaching KDE programming from the Python side. If you're programming KDE in Python, why do you have to learn C++'s prototypes (to use with SIGNAL() and SLOT()). Ultimately I end up having to go back to the C++ documentation to figure out the specifications for a particular API.

Roey

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Roey Katz
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Spare time? What's that?" -- Dirk Mueller
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.