[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: why postgres?
by AC on Wednesday 23/Feb/2005, @13:50
MPL isn't GPL compatible; there's not even a reason to look further. We're going to have to use the client libraries for these databases.

I don't see any reason not to use Postgres; there are loads of ways that all of this could be done, but the datastore is the boring part and Postgres fits our requirements. I don't really see a reason to look further at the moment.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Community and Events
 ·   Also by AC
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: why postgres?
by Scott Wheeler on Wednesday 23/Feb/2005, @13:53
Err, that was me. Konqueror is having fun with my cookies.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Re: why postgres?
by Marco Menardi on Wednesday 23/Feb/2005, @15:01
I've never heard of problems with FirebirdSQL and GPL, since you have to connect with the database, not include his code. Maybe their "modified" MPL is modified enought to be able to interface with GPL programs ;) But I'm not a lawyer.
I was replying to your message about PostgresSQL vs MySQL, and I'm sure you will be surprised on Firebird performances, low footprint, high stability, low manteniance needs, etc..
So mine was just a suggestion, since if you "don't see any reason not to use Postgres", I don't see any reason to use Postgres instead of Firebird ;)
So would be great if you could have a look also at Firebird :)
thanks
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: why postgres?
    by Ian Monroe on Thursday 24/Feb/2005, @00:11
    Well, I'd assume the client libraries for FirebirdSQL are in MPL as well. You do have to link againist those.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: why postgres?
      by Marco Menardi on Thursday 24/Feb/2005, @01:00
      Well, I use Firebird and, at the moment, my program is in Delphi under Windows, so I'm not an expert and I don't know what "client libraries" you need.
      I know, for instance, that JCA/JDBC Driver:
      http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=devel&sub=jdbc
      is distributed free of charge under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
      I don't know about ODBC/JDBC Driver
      http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=devel&sub=odbc
      or ADO.NET Data Provider
      http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=devel&sub=netprovider
      but probably the license is included in the package you can download.
      In any case, if you visit the main site I suggest you http://www.firebirdsql.org/ probably you can understand more and better.
      Thanks again
      [ Reply To This | View ]
Re: why postgres?
by brockers on Thursday 14/Apr/2005, @16:39
So KDE is going to choose a database that is LGPL because of licensing restrictions from using a straight GPL'ed database when we use a GPL'ed toolkit to do EVERYTHING related to Qt? I hope this is not really the case because it would seem to lend credibility to the Gnome-huggers who say that KDE is worthless as a general purpose business desktop because QT is GPL'ed and not LGPL'ed. If we can use QT in KDE why not MySQL? Don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with Postgres, I just hate to see KDE use the same argument against something that has been leveled against us.
[ Reply To This | View ]
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Nobody will ever write that kind of HTML code!" -- The KHTML Team
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]