[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by Allen on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @11:20
If we are taking a vote, mine would be for switching to mediawiki.

Also, can I be assured that my content is "safe" on the new wiki machine?
Are the drives RAID5? Are there tape backups? all that good stuff?

I guess we won't be able to measure the reliability of the new machine
until we use it for awhile. The old setup was just too unreliable
and frustratingly slow. Here's hoping for a better KDE wiki!
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Administrivia
 ·   Also by Allen
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by Navindra Umanee on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @12:33
Yeah, the two services Dot and Wiki were really bogging the original machine down. It's a relief to now have separate hosting solutions for the two.

I think the backup situation is pretty good for the Wiki. It's taken care of by the hosting company asmallorange, as far as I know. Luci and Jason will know more.

I wouldn't expect the Wiki to be switching to MediaWiki any time soon, if ever, if I were you guys. Not having used TikiWiki myself, what's so bad about it? The look is something that can be solved I assume, so that really shouldn't be a big deal.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
    by ac on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @13:34
    The problem is not the look IMHO. Twiki is a pain to edit. MediaWiki feels simpler, and most people are used to it (since it is more popular, and used on wikipedia.org)
    [ Reply To This | View ]
Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by Jaseone on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @13:22
>Also, can I be assured that my content is "safe" on the new wiki machine?
>Are the drives RAID5? Are there tape backups? all that good stuff?

Yes you can, I'm not even attempting to managing the hosting myself but let the experts at http://asmallorange.com take care of what they are good at. They have:

# Dual Xeon servers with 2GB of RAM and SCSI hard drives (presumably with RAID5 as they don't skimp on anything else)
# Daily and weekly off-site backups
# Redhat Enterprise Linux installed for enterprise-class performance
# 99.5% uptime guarantee

And just to make you feel extra warm and fuzzy you can read about their drool inducing data center:

"A Small Orange hosts all our clients in a state of the art datacenter facility located in Dallas, Texas which offers complete redundancy in power, HVAC, fire suppression, network connectivity, and security. The datacenter facility sits atop multiple power grids driven by TXU electric, with PowerWare UPS battery backup power and dual power generators onsite. The HVAC systems are a combination of glycol, chilled water, and condenser units by Data Aire to provide redundancy in cooling coupled with 8 managed backbone providers. Twelve more third party backbone providers are available in the building via cross connect. Fire suppression includes a pre-action dry pipe system including VESDA (Very Early Smoke Detection Apparatus) with over 600 smoke detectors. Needless to say, with these sorts of facilities, you can rest assured that your website is in good hands."
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
    by Allen on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @13:47
    Warm, Fuzzy.
    Thanks for the info.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by Anonymous on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @13:40
> Are the drives RAID5? Are there tape backups? all that good stuff?

Funny that you are requesting that for the Wiki when it doesn't exist for more important KDE servers like cvs.kde.org afaik.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
    by Allen on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @14:06
    If we were discussing other KDE servers I'd voice the appropriate concern.

    In the case of the CVS server I'm not as concerned because of the
    distributed nature of the data, and because content I create/modify
    lives under my control and then is transfered upstream. I hate
    it when I am give my content directly -- as in the case of a wiki -- and
    then data goes poof! And all I get for my time and work is an apology.
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Ok, maybe my approach is over-engineered." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]