Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by Navindra Umanee on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @12:33

Yeah, the two services Dot and Wiki were really bogging the original machine down. It's a relief to now have separate hosting solutions for the two.

I think the backup situation is pretty good for the Wiki. It's taken care of by the hosting company asmallorange, as far as I know. Luci and Jason will know more.

I wouldn't expect the Wiki to be switching to MediaWiki any time soon, if ever, if I were you guys. Not having used TikiWiki myself, what's so bad about it? The look is something that can be solved I assume, so that really shouldn't be a big deal.

Related Links

·   Articles on Administrivia
·   Also by Navindra Umanee
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: RFC: switch to MediaWiki!
by ac on Wednesday 09/Mar/2005, @13:34

The problem is not the look IMHO. Twiki is a pain to edit. MediaWiki feels simpler, and most people are used to it (since it is more popular, and used on wikipedia.org)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Don't code today what you can't debug tommorow." -- Ariya Hidayat
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.